Nevertheless, in accordance with Amazon’s argument, it appears that evidently motion pictures bought by its Prime Video platform are literally not owned by the shopper. This stems from a lawsuit by which a sure Amanda Caudel sued Amazon for what she alleges is unfair competitors and false promoting, the place she additionally claims that Amazon “secretly reserves the proper” to finish customers’ entry to content material bought by its Prime Video service.
Amazon, however, argued that motion pictures bought by Prime Video are literally not owned by the shopper, and that they’re basically renting the films for an indefinite time frame, a minimum of till it’s eliminated for no matter causes, resembling license restrictions.
Based on Amazon legal professional David Biderman, “Probably the most related settlement right here — the Prime Video Phrases of Use — is offered to customers each time they purchase digital content material on Amazon Prime Video. These Phrases of Use expressly state that purchasers acquire solely a restricted license to view video content material and that bought content material might turn into unavailable as a consequence of supplier license restriction or different causes.”
It’s an fascinating age we reside in the place subscription providers are on the rise, the place in some instances, you may save some huge cash as you not should buy content material piecemeal, however on the identical time, you’ll should cope with the truth that every now and then, such content material could also be eliminated.
Filed in. Learn extra about Amazon, Leisure, Authorized and Motion pictures. Supply: hollywoodreporter